DiChiara v. Chesworth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

DiChiara v. Chesworth

139 A.D.2d 647, 527 N.Y.S.2d 284, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4242

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 1988

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 139 A.D.2d 647 (DiChiara v. Chesworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DiChiara v. Chesworth, 139 A.D.2d 647, 527 N.Y.S.2d 284, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4242 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, dated March 5 1986, which denied the petitioner’s request for certain records of the New York State Police, under the Freedom of Information Law, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Benson, J.), entered September 25, 1986, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The return amply supports the finding Of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, that the petitioner had attempted to serve the notice of petition and petition by ordinary mail, without authority to proceed other than by personal service. Thus, the petitioner failed to obtain personal jurisdiction over the respondent and the court properly dismissed the proceeding. Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, dated March 5 1986, which denied the petitioner’s request for certain records of the New York State Police, under the Freedom of Information Law, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Benson, J.), entered September 25, 1986, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The return amply supports the finding Of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, that the petitioner had attempted to serve the notice of petition and petition by ordinary mail, without authority to proceed other than by personal service. Thus, the petitioner failed to obtain personal jurisdiction over the respondent and the court properly dismissed the proceeding. Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 A.D.2d 647, 527 N.Y.S.2d 284, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dichiara-v-chesworth-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack