DiCenzo v. A-Best Prods. Co.

878 N.E.2d 33, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1455

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 26, 2007·No. 2007-1628·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 88583, 2007-0hio-3270. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

Lundberg Stratton and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Motion for admission pro hac vice of Joni M. Mangino by Bruce P. Mandel granted.

Motions for admission pro hac vice of Mark A. Behrens and Cary Silverman by Victor E. Schwartz granted.

Motions for admission pro hac vice of Diana Nickerson Jacobs, Mark C. Meyer, David B. Rodes, and Jason T. Shipp by Joseph J. Cirilano granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 88583, 2007-0hio-3270. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

Lundberg Stratton and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Motion for admission pro hac vice of Joni M. Mangino by Bruce P. Mandel granted.

Motions for admission pro hac vice of Mark A. Behrens and Cary Silverman by Victor E. Schwartz granted.

Motions for admission pro hac vice of Diana Nickerson Jacobs, Mark C. Meyer, David B. Rodes, and Jason T. Shipp by Joseph J. Cirilano granted.

DiCenzo v. A-Best Prods. Co., 878 N.E.2d 33, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1455 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

878 N.E.2d 33 (DiCenzo v. A-Best Prods. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.