Dicam, Inc. v. Cellco Partnership

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided May 16, 2011·No. 2011-1034·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is n0nprecedential. United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit DICAM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, V. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (DOING BUSINESS AS VERIZON VVIRELESS), Defen.dcmt-Appellee, and AT&T MOBILITY LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CINGULAR WIRELESS, LLC), SPRINT SPECTRUM LP, AND NEXTEL OPERATIONS, INC., Defendants-Appellees, and PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES, LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS UTSTARCOM), Defend0:n,t-Appellee, and PALM, INC., Defendccn,t-Appellee. 2011-1034

DICAM V. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP 2 Appea1 from the United StateS DiStrict Court for the Western District of Virginia in case no. 08-CV-O053, Judge Jarnes C. Turk. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the joint motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal without prejudice. IT ls 0R:oERED TH_AT: (1) The motion is granted (2) A1l sides shall bear their own costs. MAY 1 6 2011 Date cc: Michael T. C00ke, Esq. David L. Witcofi`, Esq. Brian C. Riope11e, Esq. Mark V. Ca1npagna, Esq. David C. Doy1e, Esq. Thomas R. DeSimone, Esq. s2O ISSUED AS A MANDATE la FOR THE COURT /s)' Jan Horbaly J an Horb a1y C1erk FlLED "~%ES'é§B€§i‘F¢5E%t“J°“ mm 6 2011 wl HDRBALY ClEII€ nm 16 2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dicam, Inc. v. Cellco Partnership, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Dicam, Inc. v. Cellco Partnership (Dicam, Inc. v. Cellco Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.