Dibofsky v. Young

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Dibofsky v. Young

303 A.2d 823, 452 Pa. 609, 1973 Pa. LEXIS 495

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 4, 1973·No. Appeal, No. 114·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the Superior Court affirming the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, Civil Division, overruling defendants’ preliminary objections is hereby reversed on the authority of Yefko v. Ochs, 437 Pa. 233, 263 A. 2d 416 (1970), and the matter is remanded for proceedings consistent with this disposition.

Mr. Justice Roberts and Mr. Justice Manderino dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the Superior Court affirming the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, Civil Division, overruling defendants’ preliminary objections is hereby reversed on the authority of Yefko v. Ochs, 437 Pa. 233, 263 A. 2d 416 (1970), and the matter is remanded for proceedings consistent with this disposition.

Mr. Justice Roberts and Mr. Justice Manderino dissent.

Dibofsky v. Young, 303 A.2d 823, 452 Pa. 609, 1973 Pa. LEXIS 495 (Pa. 1973).

Pincite

303 A.2d 823 (Dibofsky v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related