DiBlasi v. Brown
550 A.2d 899, 17 Conn. App. 803, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 450
This text of 550 A.2d 899 (DiBlasi v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
DiBlasi v. Brown, 550 A.2d 899, 17 Conn. App. 803, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 450 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
The defendant Carol Russo’s claims of error implicate the fact finding function of the trial [804]*804court. We will not retry the case. Our review fails to disclose that the factual findings of the court were clearly erroneous in view of the evidence and pleadings in the whole record, or that the decision was otherwise erroneous in law. Practice Book § 4061.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
550 A.2d 899, 17 Conn. App. 803, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diblasi-v-brown-connappct-1988.