Dibbs v. Ten Be or Not Ten Be, Inc.

759 N.E.2d 366, 96 N.Y.2d 932, 733 N.Y.S.2d 367, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3156
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 20, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 759 N.E.2d 366 (Dibbs v. Ten Be or Not Ten Be, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dibbs v. Ten Be or Not Ten Be, Inc., 759 N.E.2d 366, 96 N.Y.2d 932, 733 N.Y.S.2d 367, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3156 (N.Y. 2001).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal from that part of Supreme Court’s March 31, 1999 order that granted summary judgment to respondent Lawrence Pinner, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the Appellate Division order [933]*933does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
759 N.E.2d 366, 96 N.Y.2d 932, 733 N.Y.S.2d 367, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dibbs-v-ten-be-or-not-ten-be-inc-ny-2001.