Dibbs v. Ten Be or Not Ten Be, Inc.
This text of 759 N.E.2d 366 (Dibbs v. Ten Be or Not Ten Be, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal from that part of Supreme Court’s March 31, 1999 order that granted summary judgment to respondent Lawrence Pinner, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the Appellate Division order [933]*933does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
759 N.E.2d 366, 96 N.Y.2d 932, 733 N.Y.S.2d 367, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dibbs-v-ten-be-or-not-ten-be-inc-ny-2001.