Dibble v. Robertson

1 Hay. & Haz. 65, 1842 U.S. App. LEXIS 602
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 28, 1842
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Hay. & Haz. 65 (Dibble v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dibble v. Robertson, 1 Hay. & Haz. 65, 1842 U.S. App. LEXIS 602 (D.C. Cir. 1842).

Opinion

The court passed the following decree:

The petition filed in this cause having been set for hearing upon the bill, answer and exhibit, and by consent of the parties, and it appearing to the satisfaction of the court that the deed from the president, directors and company of the Bank of the United States to Orange H. Dibble, described in the petition, has been omitted or neglected to be recorded by the said Orange II. Dibble, without any fraudulent design or intention on his part; it is, therefore, ordered by the court, this 28th of March, 1842, that the said deed be forthwith recorded subject to the limitations and conditions imposed by the act of assembly of Maryland, of 1715, Ch. 47, Sec. 8,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Hay. & Haz. 65, 1842 U.S. App. LEXIS 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dibble-v-robertson-cadc-1842.