Diaz v. Winn-Dixie Store, Inc.

587 So. 2d 677, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10762, 1991 WL 217862
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 29, 1991·No. No. 91-1232·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeals referee’s conclusions that the appellant “left [her] employment with good cause attributable to the employer” [e.s.], see § 443.101(1)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989), having made all reasonable efforts to preserve her employment, Glenn v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 516 So.2d 88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), are supported by substantial competent evidence and the applicable law. See Kan v. P. G. Cook As[678] socs., 566 So.2d 932 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Kralj v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 537 So.2d 201 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Glenn, 516 So.2d at 88. The commission therefore improperly set them aside. Kan, 566 So.2d at 932; see Florida Industrial Comm’n v. Ciarlante, 84 So.2d 1 (Fla.1955); Perez v. State Dep’t of Labor & Employment, 377 So.2d 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Consequently, the order under review denying unemployment compensation benefits is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to afford the appellant the benefits claimed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz v. Winn-Dixie Store, Inc., 587 So. 2d 677, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10762, 1991 WL 217862 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

587 So. 2d 677 (Diaz v. Winn-Dixie Store, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n
823 So. 2d 275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Nelson v. Burdines, Inc.
611 So. 2d 1329 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Iglesias v. Eagle National Bank of Miami
598 So. 2d 262 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)