Diaz v. United States
154 U.S. 590, 38 L. Ed. 1089, 14 S. Ct. 1200, 1873 U.S. LEXIS 1363
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
I am instructed to say that the decree in the Circuit Court for the District of California is affirmed on the authority of Pico v. United States, 2 Wall. 279, and Peralta v. United States, 3 Wall. 434. It is not thought necessary to do more than to refer to these cases. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Diaz v. United States, 154 U.S. 590, 38 L. Ed. 1089, 14 S. Ct. 1200, 1873 U.S. LEXIS 1363 (1873).
154 U.S. 590 (Diaz v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pico v. United States
69 U.S. 279 (Supreme Court, 1865)
Peralta v. United States
70 U.S. 434 (Supreme Court, 1866)