Diaz v. Structural Prestressed Industries, Inc.

922 So. 2d 366, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2742, 2006 WL 473749
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 1, 2006·No. No. 3D04-638·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cerniglia v. Cerniglia, 679 So.2d 1160 (Fla.1996); Patco Transp., Inc. v. Estupinan, 917 So.2d 922 (Fla. 1st [367]*367DCA 2005); Hanson v. Gimrock Constr., Inc., 807 So.2d 167 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); cf. Pacheco v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 784 So.2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), review denied, 805 So.2d 806 (Fla.2001).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz v. Structural Prestressed Industries, Inc., 922 So. 2d 366, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2742, 2006 WL 473749 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

922 So. 2d 366 (Diaz v. Structural Prestressed Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patco Transport, Inc. v. Estupinan
917 So. 2d 922 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Cerniglia v. Cerniglia
679 So. 2d 1160 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Pacheco v. Florida Power & Light Co.
784 So. 2d 1159 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Hanson v. Gimrock Construction, Inc.
807 So. 2d 167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)