Diaz v. State

910 So. 2d 351, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14412, 2005 WL 2219292
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Diaz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 837 So. 2d 436
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 14, 2005·No. No. 4D05-595·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Angel Diaz timely appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion. In claim seven of his motion, he alleged that his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel by not filing a motion in limine to exclude child hearsay or objecting to the introduction of child hearsay where the trial court did not make the necessary findings of ■ reliability under the child hearsay exception, section 90.803(23)(a), Florida Statutes (1997). We find that this claim is legally sufficient and not refuted by the record. Accordingly we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on this issue. We affirm the denial of his other claims.

GUNTHER, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz v. State, 910 So. 2d 351, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14412, 2005 WL 2219292 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

910 So. 2d 351 (Diaz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.