Diaz v. State

487 So. 2d 1225, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1162, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7842
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 14, 1986·No. No. 85-43·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s sentence is affirmed. Although a sentencing guidelines scoresheet and a written memorandum setting forth reasons for departure appear in the record, appellant’s sentence is not a guidelines sentence because the offense was committed prior to October 1, 1983, and appellant did not affirmatively select to be sentenced under the guidelines. See Johnson v. State, 486 So.2d 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHEB and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz v. State, 487 So. 2d 1225, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1162, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7842 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

487 So. 2d 1225 (Diaz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weathers v. State
508 So. 2d 1332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)