Diaz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

427 So. 2d 335, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 29050
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 1, 1983·No. No. 82-1076·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Travelers Insurance Co. v. Bartoszewicz, 404 So.2d 1053 (Fla.1981); New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Hart, 153 Fla. 840, 16 So.2d 118 (1943); Florida Insurance Guaranty Association v. Cope, 405 So.2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Mackoul v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, 402 So.2d 1259 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), review denied, 412 So.2d 467 (Fla.1982); Biondino v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co., 319 So.2d 152 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 427 So. 2d 335, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 29050 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

427 So. 2d 335 (Diaz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Biondino v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co.
319 So. 2d 152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
MacKoul v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York
402 So. 2d 1259 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Florida Ins. Guaranty Ass'n v. Cope
405 So. 2d 292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Travelers Ins. Co. v. Bartoszewicz
404 So. 2d 1053 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Hart
16 So. 2d 118 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)