Diaz v. Ros

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Diaz v. Ros

781 So. 2d 1175, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4750, 2001 WL 357022

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 11, 2001

DocketNo. 3D00-2730

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 781 So. 2d 1175 (Diaz v. Ros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diaz v. Ros, 781 So. 2d 1175, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4750, 2001 WL 357022 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because there is a total, embarrassing lack of evidence to support a modification of the custody provisions of the final judgment under applicable principles of law, Perez v. Perez, 767 So.2d 513 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); see Muniz v. Muniz, — So.2d -, 2001 WL 293088 (Fla. 3d DCA Case no. 3D00-312, opinion filed, March 28, 2001), the order under review, which purports to do so, is reversed and the cause remanded with directions forthwith to restore the minor child of the parties to the appellant mother, to reinstate the custody and support provisions of the final judgment and for other proceedings consistent herewith.

This decision shall take effect immediately without regard to the filing or disposition of any motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because there is a total, embarrassing lack of evidence to support a modification of the custody provisions of the final judgment under applicable principles of law, Perez v. Perez, 767 So.2d 513 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); see Muniz v. Muniz, — So.2d -, 2001 WL 293088 (Fla. 3d DCA Case no. 3D00-312, opinion filed, March 28, 2001), the order under review, which purports to do so, is reversed and the cause remanded with directions forthwith to restore the minor child of the parties to the appellant mother, to reinstate the custody and support provisions of the final judgment and for other proceedings consistent herewith.

This decision shall take effect immediately without regard to the filing or disposition of any motion for rehearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

781 So. 2d 1175, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4750, 2001 WL 357022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-v-ros-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack