Diaz v. Ralph

66 A.D.3d 819, 886 N.Y.S.2d 617
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 20, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendant Head & Neck Surgical Group, LLC, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Rebolini, J.), dated July 15, 2008, which denied its motion to vacate so much of a prior order of the same court (Baisley, Jr., J.), dated February 19, 2008, as granted the plaintiffs unopposed motion for leave to enter a default judgment upon its failure to appear or answer the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To prevail on a motion to vacate its default, a defendant is required to demonstrate both a reasonable excuse therefor and a meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Fekete v Camp Skwere, 16 AD3d 544, 545 [2005]; Amato v Fast Repair, Inc., 15 AD3d 429 [2005]; Czarnik v Urban, 10 AD3d 627 [2004]).

The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse lies within the trial court’s discretion (see Santiago v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 10 AD3d 393, 394 [2004]). Here, the appellant presented neither an acceptable excuse for its failure to timely serve an answer nor a meritorious defense. Accordingly, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion to vacate its default. Fisher, J.P., Florio, Angiolillo, Eng and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz v. Ralph, 66 A.D.3d 819, 886 N.Y.S.2d 617 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

66 A.D.3d 819 (Diaz v. Ralph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LOUCKS, CAROLYN v. KLIMEK, JR., M.D., WALDEMAR
108 A.D.3d 1037 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)