Diaz v. New York City Housing Authority

186 A.D.2d 421, 588 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11331

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.), entered on or about November 14, 1991, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to serve a proper notice of claim, and granted plaintiffs cross-motion to amend the bill of particulars, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The notice of claim was sufficient to enable defendant New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) to locate any defects and to conduct an investigation at the designated building. [422] Thus, the trial court properly denied NYCHA’s motion to dismiss and granted plaintiffs cross-motion to amend the bill of particulars to include the correct building address number (see, Shea v Incorporated Vil. of Head of Harbor, 180 AD2d 675). Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Ross, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz v. New York City Housing Authority, 186 A.D.2d 421, 588 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11331 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

186 A.D.2d 421 (Diaz v. New York City Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shea v. Inc. Village of Head of the Harbor
180 A.D.2d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)