Diaz v. Kia Express, LLC
This text of Diaz v. Kia Express, LLC (Diaz v. Kia Express, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee re er HH HX ISAAC MANUEL DIAZ, et ano., Plaintiffs
-against- 25-5112 (LAK)
KIA EXPRESS LLC, et ano., Defendants eee ee ee ee ee eH ee ee er ee ee re ee re ee ee eee eH HX
ORDER LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1441. The notice of removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass’nv. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996). O The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). oO The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 US. / 195 (1990). The exact nature and citizenship of one or more alleged limited liability companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000). Absent the filing, on or before August 22, 2025 of an amended notice of removal adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 14, 2025
LewitXA. aplan United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Diaz v. Kia Express, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-v-kia-express-llc-nysd-2025.