Diaz v. INVICTA WATCH COMPANY
17 So. 3d 320
Opinion
Margarita DIAZ, Appellant,
v.
INVICTA WATCH COMPANY, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Rene Hidalgo of Richard E. Zaldivar, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.
Lourdes E. Ferrer of Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans, Abel, Lurvey, Morrow & Shefer, P.A., Hollywood, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
REVERSED and REMANDED. See Providence Prop. & Cas. v. Wilson, 990 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).
ALLEN, PADOVANO, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Diaz v. INVICTA WATCH COMPANY, 17 So. 3d 320 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
17 So. 3d 320 (Diaz v. INVICTA WATCH COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
PROVIDENCE PROPERTY AND CAS. v. Wilson
990 So. 2d 1224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)