Diaz v. Home Depot USA, Inc.

137 So. 3d 1195, 2014 WL 1493553, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5540
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 16, 2014
DocketNo. 3D13-1024
StatusPublished

This text of 137 So. 3d 1195 (Diaz v. Home Depot USA, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diaz v. Home Depot USA, Inc., 137 So. 3d 1195, 2014 WL 1493553, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5540 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

SCALES, J.

Appellant, Eileen Diaz, appeals from an order dismissing her case with prejudice on the basis of fraud on the court.

For procedural reasons, we remand for an evidentiary hearing. See Medina v. Fla. E. Coast Ry., L.L.C., 866 So.2d 89, 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (stating dismissal as a sanction should be employed only after a plaintiff has been given fair notice and an opportunity to be heard and reversing where the trial court did not grant the plaintiffs request for an evidentiary hearing); Sklandis v. Walgreen Co., 832 So.2d 942, 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (“The plaintiff is entitled to fair notice and an opportunity to be heard, prior to any order being entered which would dismiss the case on the basis of fraud and perjury.”). We express no opinion on the merits of the motion or any sanction which ultimately may be imposed.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Medina v. FLORIDA EAST COAST RY., LLC
866 So. 2d 89 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Sklandis v. Walgreen Co.
832 So. 2d 942 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 So. 3d 1195, 2014 WL 1493553, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-v-home-depot-usa-inc-fladistctapp-2014.