Diaz v. Home Depot USA, Inc.

137 So. 3d 1195, 2014 WL 1493553, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5540
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Diaz v. Home Depot USA, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10692
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 2014·No. No. 3D13-1024·Published

Opinion

SCALES, J.

Appellant, Eileen Diaz, appeals from an order dismissing her case with prejudice on the basis of fraud on the court.

For procedural reasons, we remand for an evidentiary hearing. See Medina v. Fla. E. Coast Ry., L.L.C., 866 So.2d 89, 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (stating dismissal as a sanction should be employed only after a plaintiff has been given fair notice and an opportunity to be heard and reversing where the trial court did not grant the plaintiffs request for an evidentiary hearing); Sklandis v. Walgreen Co., 832 So.2d 942, 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (“The plaintiff is entitled to fair notice and an opportunity to be heard, prior to any order being entered which would dismiss the case on the basis of fraud and perjury.”). We express no opinion on the merits of the motion or any sanction which ultimately may be imposed.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz v. Home Depot USA, Inc., 137 So. 3d 1195, 2014 WL 1493553, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5540 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

137 So. 3d 1195 (Diaz v. Home Depot USA, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Medina v. FLORIDA EAST COAST RY., LLC
866 So. 2d 89 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Sklandis v. Walgreen Co.
832 So. 2d 942 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)