Diaz v. Hernandez
360 So. 2d 58, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 22420
This text of 360 So. 2d 58 (Diaz v. Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Diaz v. Hernandez, 360 So. 2d 58, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 22420 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).
Opinion
The only substantial question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court properly applied the test set forth in Marshall v. Papineau, 132 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961); and Reeder v. Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc., 338 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), in excluding the testimony of an expert witness. Our review of the record shows no error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Reeder v. Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc.
338 So. 2d 271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Marshall v. Papineau
132 So. 2d 786 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
360 So. 2d 58, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 22420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-v-hernandez-fladistctapp-1978.