Diaz v. Federal Bureau of Pr
This text of Diaz v. Federal Bureau of Pr (Diaz v. Federal Bureau of Pr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to lst Cir. Loc. R. 32.3
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 02-1399
OSCAR DIAZ,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Patti B. Saris, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Lynch and Howard, Circuit Judges.
Oscar Diaz on brief pro se. Michael J. Sullivan, United States Attorney, and Nancy Rue, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellee.
January 24, 2003 Per Curiam. Upon de novo review of the district court
judgment in light of the parties' arguments and the record on
appeal, we affirm the summary judgment substantially for the
reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's report of December 20,
2001 and the district judge's order of February 7, 2002.
Appellant's additional assignments of error relating to the in
camera inspection of the tape recording and proof of its
authenticity, and the court's interpretation of appellant's
pleading, are meritless.
Appellant's letter motion requesting a copy of the tape
recording is dismissed as moot.
Affirmed.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Diaz v. Federal Bureau of Pr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-v-federal-bureau-of-pr-ca1-2003.