Diaz v. Federal Bureau of Pr

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 2003
Docket02-1399
StatusPublished

This text of Diaz v. Federal Bureau of Pr (Diaz v. Federal Bureau of Pr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diaz v. Federal Bureau of Pr, (1st Cir. 2003).

Opinion

Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to lst Cir. Loc. R. 32.3

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 02-1399

OSCAR DIAZ,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Patti B. Saris, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Selya, Lynch and Howard, Circuit Judges.

Oscar Diaz on brief pro se. Michael J. Sullivan, United States Attorney, and Nancy Rue, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellee.

January 24, 2003 Per Curiam. Upon de novo review of the district court

judgment in light of the parties' arguments and the record on

appeal, we affirm the summary judgment substantially for the

reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's report of December 20,

2001 and the district judge's order of February 7, 2002.

Appellant's additional assignments of error relating to the in

camera inspection of the tape recording and proof of its

authenticity, and the court's interpretation of appellant's

pleading, are meritless.

Appellant's letter motion requesting a copy of the tape

recording is dismissed as moot.

Affirmed.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Diaz v. Federal Bureau of Pr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-v-federal-bureau-of-pr-ca1-2003.