Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Diaz v. Epstein

Diaz v. Epstein

443 So. 2d 465, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11274
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 11, 1984·No. No. 83-1385·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order denying Defendants’ Verified Motion for Change of Venue pursuant to Section 47.122, Florida Statutes, upon authority of:

Hughes Supply, Inc. v. Pearl, 403 So.2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
[466] Florida Power & Light v. Troutman, 396 So.2d 743 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
Hertz Corporation v. Rentz, 326 So.2d 216 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

Reversed and Remanded.

LETTS, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz v. Epstein, 443 So. 2d 465, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11274 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

443 So. 2d 465 (Diaz v. Epstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hughes Supply, Inc. v. Pearl
403 So. 2d 614 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Hertz Corporation v. Rentz
326 So. 2d 216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Florida Power & Light Co. v. Troutman
396 So. 2d 743 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)