Diaz v. Casino Café

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed January 2, 2019.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D17-2004

Lower Tribunal No. 14-21382

________________

Adria Diaz,

Appellant,

vs.

Casino Café, Inc., etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Monica Gordo, Judge.

Adria Diaz, in proper person.

Johnson Law Group, and Jeffrey W. Johnson and Michael E. Wargo (Boca Raton), for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order granting final summary judgment in favor of the appellee. “Summary judgment is designed to test the sufficiency of the evidence to determine if there is sufficient evidence at issue to justify a trial or formal hearing on the issues raised in the pleadings, and summary judgment is appropriate where, as a matter of law, it is apparent from the pleadings, depositions, affidavits, or other evidence that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to relief as a matter of law.” Fla. Bar v. Greene, 926 So. 2d 1195, 1200 (Fla. 2006). Given the record before us, there was no genuine issue of material fact and the appellee was entitled to relief as a matter of law. Id.; See Sokoloff v. Oceania I Condo. Ass’n, Inc., 201 So. 3d 664, 664–65 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Affirmed.