Diaz v. Arizona
This text of 555 F. App'x 698 (Diaz v. Arizona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Joseph Diaz and Luis Campas brought a 20-count, 51-page complaint against a dozen defendants. Diaz and Campas claim that one defendant wrote them a bad check, and that when they tried to have that defendant prosecuted, the other defendants retaliated against them by, among other things, taking away their boxing licenses. (Diaz is a trainer and Cam-pas a boxer.) The district court granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Campas and Diaz appeal. Jurisdiction lies under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th Cir.2005), and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
555 F. App'x 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-v-arizona-ca9-2014.