Diaz v. Allison Clark
This text of 1 A.D.2d 473 (Diaz v. Allison Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover uninsured motorist’s benefits, New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Dillon, J.), dated December 11, 2002, as granted the plaintiffs cross motion to compel it to proceed to arbitration of the plaintiffs uninsured motorist claim.
[474]*474Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The appellant’s contention that the plaintiffs claim for uninsured motorist benefits is time-barred is without merit (see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Morrison, 267 AD2d 381 [1999]; Matter of Continental Ins. Co. v Richt, 253 AD2d 818, 819 [1998]; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Giordano, 108 AD2d 910 [1985], affd 66 NY2d 810 [1985]).
The appellant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Santucci, J.E, S. Miller, Goldstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 A.D.2d 473, 767 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1 A.D.3d 473, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-v-allison-clark-nyappdiv-2003.