Diaz v. Adams

Ninth Circuit

Diaz v. Adams

670 F.3d 1023, 2012 WL 251920, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 1513

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 27, 2012

DocketNo. 08-15808

StatusPublished

This text of 670 F.3d 1023 (Diaz v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diaz v. Adams, 670 F.3d 1023, 2012 WL 251920, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 1513 (9th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This case is now controlled by the Supreme Court’s decision in Harrington v. Richter, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 770, 178 L.Ed.2d 624 (2011). In light of Harrington, we conclude that the state court’s decision was neither contrary to, nor involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This case is now controlled by the Supreme Court’s decision in Harrington v. Richter, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 770, 178 L.Ed.2d 624 (2011). In light of Harrington, we conclude that the state court’s decision was neither contrary to, nor involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

670 F.3d 1023, 2012 WL 251920, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 1513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-v-adams-ca9-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack