Diaz, Ruben v. Create and Construct, LLC

2019 TN WC 100
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims·Decided July 5, 2019·No. 2019-06-0263·Published

Opinion

FILED Jul 05, 2019 11:00 AM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT NASHVILLE Ruben Diaz, ) Docket No. 2019-06-0263 Employee, ) ) Vv. ) State File No. 9687-2019 ) Create and Construct, LLC, ) Uninsured Employer. ) Judge Kenneth M. Switzer

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING MEDICAL BENEFITS

The Court held an expedited hearing on July 2 on Ruben Diaz’s request for medical and temporary disability benefits.' The present focus is whether Mr. Diaz suffered an injury arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment with Create and Construct. If so, then the question is to which benefits is he entitled. The Court holds he suffered an injury arising primarily out of his employment and orders Create and Construct to provide a panel of orthopedic specialists as well as payment of medical bills incurred for this injury. However, on the present record, Mr. Diaz is not entitled to temporary disability benefits.

Claim History Mr. Diaz is a Davidson County resident. He testified that in August 2018, he

began working for Create and Construct. On December 30, 2018, he injured his left rib and back while demolishing a floor at work.” He slipped and fell as he pulled a cart

'Mr. Diaz’s principal language is Spanish. A certified court interpreter interpreted at the hearing and also translated Mr. Diaz’s affidavits into the record.

* The Petition for Benefit Determination, Dispute Certification Notice and Affidavit accompanying the hearing request list an injury date of November 30, 2018. However, the Compliance investigator’s report lists December 30, 2018, as the date of injury. The emergency room records likewise contained histories that Mr. Diaz became injured on December 30. Mr. Diaz clarified the date of injury in his second

I containing concrete up a wet, wooden ramp.

The next day, Mr. Diaz returned to the jobsite and reported the injury to Lance Pettyjohn, one of Create and Construct’s owners. Mr. Pettyjohn refused to offer treatment. Mr. Diaz then went to the hospital. Records from that visit stated that he “presents for left posterior back pain after a slip and fall while at work carrying concrete down a ramp using a wheel barrel [sic].” Providers diagnosed left-rib pain and took him off work for two days. They told him to follow up with his primary care physician or to return if his pain worsened. It did, so Mr. Diaz sought emergency care on January 5, 2019, at which time providers diagnosed a rib fracture and excused him from work through January 7. He filed no additional treatment records.

Mr. Diaz filed a Petition for Benefit Determination on February 1, 2019, alleging he suffered a back injury and fractured rib. Because he also alleged that Create and Construct is uninsured, the Bureau referred the case to its Compliance Unit.

Per a written report, a Compliance investigator interviewed Brendon Glean, the co-owner of Create and Construct, who said that Mr. Diaz was a subcontractor. The business owners are on the Workers’ Compensation Exemption Registry.

Mr. Diaz testified in his affidavit and at the hearing regarding his status as an employee. He stated that Mr. Pettyjohn ordered “what to do at work.” Mr. Pettyjohn also controlled the work hours, told them where to go to work, and paid them weekly by company checks. Mr. Diaz introduced copies of two of his paychecks bearing Mr. Pettyjohn’s signature. He said they paid him at an hourly rate, and he never worked under a contract. The Compliance investigator’s report generally substantiates these contentions.

Mr. Diaz incurred bills that he said were for treatment of the work injury. They included $220.07 to Southern Hills Medical Center for emergency room care and $844.00 to the emergency physician, Dr. Drew Flansbaum, both for dates of service of December 31, 2018.2 Mr. Diaz asked the Court to order Create and Construct to pay these bills. He testified that he currently works for a different employer for a lower rate of pay because he is unable to lift heavy objects due to pain and fear of re-injury. He also seeks temporary total disability benefits.

affidavit as December 30, 2018.

3 Mr. Diaz additionally filed a bill from Radiology Alliance. However, the bill does not list a date of service. The Court declined to admit it into evidence because the bill is not clearly related to treatment of the December 30 accident. Mr. Diaz may obtain additional documentation to establish that the bill relates to this injury at the final compensation hearing. Create and Construct did not appear at the hearing, despite receiving a certified- mail notice. Per the Dispute Certification Notice, its owners contest compensability.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Diaz must present sufficient evidence that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2018); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). Specifically, he must establish that his injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment with Create and Construct. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14).

Mr. Diaz credibly testified regarding the events of December 30, 2018. The Court finds that he slipped on a wet ramp pushing a heavy wheelbarrow while working for Create and Construct, resulting in injury and the need for medical treatment. Create and Construct’s owners did not appear at the hearing to contradict Mr. Diaz’s testimony. Further, the hospital records documented a history similar to his testimony. Therefore, the Court holds Mr. Diaz is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits that he suffered an injury arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment with Create and Construct.

According to the Dispute Certification Notice, Create and Construct argued the following defense at mediation: “The employer asserts that he is on the exempt registry and did not have workers [sic] compensation.” Create and Construct did not appear at the hearing to raise this as a defense or clarify the mediator’s statement on the Dispute Certification Notice. Importantly, Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-110 lists the affirmative defenses available to employers. A worker’s or employer’s presence on the Registry is not among them. Rather, Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-902(a) requires all construction services providers to carry workers’ compensation insurance. Create and Construct, a construction service provider, was required to carry insurance, which it failed to do.*

The Court now turns to the requested benefits. Mr. Diaz seeks medical benefits. Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(1)(A) requires an employer to provide, free of charge to the employee, medical treatment made reasonably necessary by the work accident. Mr. Diaz credibly testified that he continues to experience pain from the work injury. Thus, the Court orders Create and Construct to offer a panel of three independent, reputable orthopedic specialists as required under section 50-6- 204(a)(3)(A)(i). Further, Mr. Diaz introduced medical bills and testified that he incurred them for treatment relating to the work injury. The Court finds the treatment reasonable,

* Although the Compliance investigator’s report addresses whether Mr. Diaz worked as an employee or subcontractor, the Dispute Certification Notice does not list this as a defense. Therefore, the Court need not address it. necessary and related to the accident.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz, Ruben v. Create and Construct, LLC, 2019 TN WC 100 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2019).

2019 TN WC 100 (Diaz, Ruben v. Create and Construct, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 50-6-102
Tennessee § 50-6-102(14)
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)
§ 50-6-801
Tennessee § 50-6-801(d)(1)