Diaz-Rodriguez v. United States

412 U.S. 964, 93 S. Ct. 3024, 37 L. Ed. 2d 1013, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 2002
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 19, 1973
DocketNo. 72-6818
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 412 U.S. 964 (Diaz-Rodriguez v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diaz-Rodriguez v. United States, 412 U.S. 964, 93 S. Ct. 3024, 37 L. Ed. 2d 1013, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 2002 (1973).

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed under Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Eckstein v. Midwest Pride IV
713 N.E.2d 1055 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1998)
United States v. Rodimiro Rojas-Oquita
5 F.3d 543 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Turner v. Housewright
599 F. Supp. 1358 (D. Nevada, 1984)
State v. Olsen
647 P.2d 734 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1982)
State v. Bember
439 A.2d 387 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1981)
Ruderer v. Fines
614 F.2d 1128 (Seventh Circuit, 1980)
Hart Book Stores, Inc. Raleigh Books, Inc. Tri-State News, Inc. Ronald Mothershead, D/B/A R. And M. Adult Book Store Jesse F. Frye, Jr., D/B/A L. & J. News Stand Larry Gene Moore, D/B/A E. & M. Enterprises Thomas Page, D/B/A Player's Book Store Joseph Raymond Mc Broom, D/B/A M Distributors Camera's Eye, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation v. Rufus Edmisten, Attorney General of North Carolina Randolph Riley, Districtattorney for 10th Judicial District E. Raymond Alexander, District Attorneyfor 18th Judicial District Donald K. Tisdale, District Attorney for 21stjudicial Districtdonald Jacobs, District Attorney for 8th Judicial District Dan K. Edwards,district Attorney for 14th Judicial District H. W. Zimmerman, Districtattorney for 22nd Judicial District Donald Greene, District Attorney for 25thjudicial Districtjames C. Roberts, District Attorney for 19th Judicial District, W. A. Allen,sheriff, Durham County, North Carolina T. B. Seagroves, Chief of Police, Cityof Durham, North Carolina the State of North Carolina William H. Andrews,district Attorneyfor 4th Judicial District William Allen Cobb, District Attorney for 5thjudicial District Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney for 12th Judicialdistrict Wade Barber, Jr., District Attorney for 15(b) Judicial District C.D. Knight, Sheriff,orange County, North Carolina Herman Stone, Chief of Police, City of Chapelhill, North Carolina, U. T. Incorporated, a Georgia Corporation, D/B/A Camera's Eye Bookstore Andmind's Eye, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation, D/B/A as Mind's Eye Andimperial Book Store v. Rufus Edmisten, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina Joseph Brown, District Attorney of the Twenty-Seventh Judicial District and Individually C.C. Elmore, Chief of Police of City of Gastonia and Individually Petergilchrist,district Attorney for the Twenty-Sixth Judicial District and Individuallydonald Greene, District Attorney for the Twenty-Fifth Judicial District Andindividually
612 F.2d 821 (Fourth Circuit, 1979)
United States v. A. Gordon Eldred
588 F.2d 746 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
State v. Smoot
590 P.2d 1001 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1978)
Spokane Arcades, Inc. v. Ray
449 F. Supp. 1145 (E.D. Washington, 1978)
Fehlhaber v. State of North Carolina
445 F. Supp. 130 (E.D. North Carolina, 1978)
Universal Amusement Co. v. Vance
559 F.2d 1286 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
United States v. Brashier
548 F.2d 1315 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)
People Ex Rel. Busch v. Projection Room Theater
550 P.2d 600 (California Supreme Court, 1976)
United States v. Ollie H. Miller
529 F.2d 1125 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)
Teodulo Diaz-Rodriguez v. United States
412 U.S. 964 (Supreme Court, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
412 U.S. 964, 93 S. Ct. 3024, 37 L. Ed. 2d 1013, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 2002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-rodriguez-v-united-states-scotus-1973.