Diaz-Perna v. Evens

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Diaz-Perna v. Evens

833 So. 2d 795, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8537, 2002 WL 1332738

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 19, 2002

DocketNo. 3D02-542

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 833 So. 2d 795 (Diaz-Perna v. Evens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diaz-Perna v. Evens, 833 So. 2d 795, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8537, 2002 WL 1332738 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pedro Diaz-Perna appeals an order denying unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.

Under the unemployment compensation law, an employee is disqualified for benefits when “he or she has voluntarily left his or her work without good cause attributable to his or her employing unit .... ” § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001). In this case the appellant quit his employment because he believed he was going to be terminated or have his salary reduced. Under the unemployment compensation law, that constitutes voluntarily leaving the employment without good cause attributable to the employing unit. Id. Thus, unemployment benefits were correctly denied under the applicable statute.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Pedro Diaz-Perna appeals an order denying unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.

Under the unemployment compensation law, an employee is disqualified for benefits when “he or she has voluntarily left his or her work without good cause attributable to his or her employing unit .... ” § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001). In this case the appellant quit his employment because he believed he was going to be terminated or have his salary reduced. Under the unemployment compensation law, that constitutes voluntarily leaving the employment without good cause attributable to the employing unit. Id. Thus, unemployment benefits were correctly denied under the applicable statute.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

833 So. 2d 795, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8537, 2002 WL 1332738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-perna-v-evens-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack