Diaz-Luengas v. State

90 So. 3d 923, 2012 WL 2327851, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9942
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 20, 2012
DocketNo. 4D11-1021
StatusPublished

This text of 90 So. 3d 923 (Diaz-Luengas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diaz-Luengas v. State, 90 So. 3d 923, 2012 WL 2327851, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9942 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Davis v. State, 69 So.3d 315 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (citing Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010) is not applied retroactively)).

HAZOURI, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Davis v. State
69 So. 3d 315 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Hernandez v. State
61 So. 3d 1144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 So. 3d 923, 2012 WL 2327851, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-luengas-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.