Diaz (Julian) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided September 30, 2019·No. 79587·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JULIAN ANTONIO DIAZ, No, 79587 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, FLED Respondent.

3 0 2019

CLERK 'F BY

CEPUIY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a judgment of conviction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Cristina D. Silva, Judge.

This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.

Specifically, the district court entered the judgment of conviction on June 5, 2019. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal, however, until September 5, 2019, well after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). "[Mil untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court." Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

I

Hardesty

Al.L$C44.0

Stiglich

J. LiLe.m.e.)

Silver

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(01 1947A (4/404D

cc: Hon. Cristina D. Silva, District Judge Julian Antonio Diaz Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz (Julian) Vs. State, (Neb. 2019).

Diaz (Julian) Vs. State (Diaz (Julian) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lozada v. State
871 P.2d 944 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1994)