Diaz (Julian) Vs. State
This text of Diaz (Julian) Vs. State (Diaz (Julian) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JULIAN ANTONIO DIAZ, No, 79587 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FLED Respondent. 3 0 2019 CLERK 'F BY CEPUIY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a judgment of conviction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Cristina D. Silva, Judge. This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district court entered the judgment of conviction on June 5, 2019. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal, however, until September 5, 2019, well after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). "[Mil untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court." Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
I Hardesty
Al.L$C44.0 Stiglich J. LiLe.m.e.) Silver
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(01 1947A (4/404D cc: Hon. Cristina D. Silva, District Judge Julian Antonio Diaz Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
(0) 1947A 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Diaz (Julian) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-julian-vs-state-nev-2019.