Diaz, E. v. 12th Jud Dist Dauphin CCP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 18, 2022·No. 40 MM 2022·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

ERIC DIAZ (ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND : No. 40 MM 2022 ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, AS : WELL AS ALL THE VOTERS OF DAUPHIN : COUNTY AND THE CITIZENS OF : PENNSYLVANIA), :

:

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

(1) 12TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, AKA: : DAUPHIN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON : PLEAS; (2) HONORABLE JOHN F. : CHERRY, P.J., IN HIS OFFICIAL : CAPACITY; (3) DAUPHIN COUNTY ADULT : PROBATION/PAROLE DEPARTMENT ; : AND (4) DIRECTOR CHADWICK J. LIBBY, : IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of July, 2022, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is

DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz, E. v. 12th Jud Dist Dauphin CCP, (Pa. 2022).

Diaz, E. v. 12th Jud Dist Dauphin CCP (Diaz, E. v. 12th Jud Dist Dauphin CCP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.