Diaz, E. v. 12th Jud Dist Dauphin CCP
This text of Diaz, E. v. 12th Jud Dist Dauphin CCP (Diaz, E. v. 12th Jud Dist Dauphin CCP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
ERIC DIAZ (ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND : No. 40 MM 2022 ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, AS : WELL AS ALL THE VOTERS OF DAUPHIN : COUNTY AND THE CITIZENS OF : PENNSYLVANIA), : : Petitioner : : : v. : : : (1) 12TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, AKA: : DAUPHIN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON : PLEAS; (2) HONORABLE JOHN F. : CHERRY, P.J., IN HIS OFFICIAL : CAPACITY; (3) DAUPHIN COUNTY ADULT : PROBATION/PAROLE DEPARTMENT ; : AND (4) DIRECTOR CHADWICK J. LIBBY, : IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 18th day of July, 2022, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is
DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Diaz, E. v. 12th Jud Dist Dauphin CCP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-e-v-12th-jud-dist-dauphin-ccp-pa-2022.