Diarra v. Coastal Alaska Premier Seafoods LLC

• Court: District Court, W.D. Washington
• Decided: January 14, 2020
• Docket: 2:19-cv-01070
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 AT SEATTLE 7 YACOUBA DIARRA, 8 Case No.: 2:19-cv-01070-RSL

Plaintiff, 9 vs. ORDER GRANTING 10 COASTAL ALASKA PREMIER SEAFOODS, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY CASE AND COMPEL 11 LLC, AND F/V DEEP PACIFIC LLC, IN ARBITRATION PERSONAM; THE F/V DEEP PACIFIC, 12 OFFICIAL NUMBER 640128, HER ENGINES, MACHINERY, APPURTENANCES AND 13 CARGO, IN REM, 14 Defendants. 15

17 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Stay Case 18 and Compel Arbitration. Dkt. # 19. Having reviewed the pleadings in this matter it is 19 hereby ORDERED that: 20 1. Defendants’ Motion to Stay Case and Compel Arbitration is hereby 21 GRANTED. The Ninth Circuit applies a four-factor test when determining whether to 22 enforce an arbitration clause under the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement 23 of Foreign Arbitral Awards, which is codified in the second chapter of Title 9 of the 24 United States Code. Balen v. Holland Am. Line Inc., 583 F.3d 647, 654 (9th Cir. 2009); 25 Rogers v. Royal Caribbean Cruise Line, 547 F.3d 1148, 1152 (9th Cir. 2008). The 26 parties dispute whether the fourth factor is satisfied in this case. Plaintiff, relying on a 27 1 treatise, posits that the fourth factor requires that “the matter must not be entirely 2 domestic in scope and argues that an injury occurring on a U.S.-flagged vessel in U.S. 3 waters is “as ‘domestic’ as it gets.” Dkt. # 22 at 1-2 (quoting Thomas J. Schoenbaum, 4 Admiralty and Maritime Law § 6:13 (6th ed. 2018)). The Ninth Circuit’s formulation of 5 the fourth factor makes clear, however, that if a party to the agreement is not an 6 American citizen, the dispute is not entirely domestic in scope. Balen, 583 F.3d at 654- 7 55 (an arbitration agreement will be enforced under the Convention if “(4) a party to the 8 agreement is not an American citizen, or that the commercial relationship has some 9 reasonable relation with one or more foreign states.”) (quoting Bautista v. Star Cruises, 10 396 F.3d 1289, 1294 n.7 (11th Cir. 2005)). Plaintiff does not dispute defendant’s 11 contention that he is a citizen of Mali. 12 2. This matter is hereby STAYED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a 13 statistical termination in this case. Such termination is entered solely for the purpose of 14 removing this case from the Court’s active calendar. If a motion to confirm or vacate the 15 arbitral award is necessary, it may be filed under this cause number. 16 3. Pursuant to the arbitration agreement between the parties and the 17 Convention, the parties are directed to proceed to arbitration in either Seattle, 18 Washington or Anchorage, Alaska. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated this 14th day of January, 2020. 22

23 A

24 ROBERT S. LASNIK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27