Dianna Helmers v. City of Des Moines
This text of Dianna Helmers v. City of Des Moines (Dianna Helmers v. City of Des Moines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 17–0794
Polk County No. CVCV053097
ORDER
DIANNA HELMERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA, Defendant-Appellee.
The court, being evenly divided, declares this case affirmed by operation of law. See Iowa Code § 602.4107 (2017). Waterman, Mansfield, and Christensen, JJ., would affirm the judgment of the district court; Cady, C.J., and Wiggins and Appel, JJ., would reverse the judgment of the district court. See State v. Effler, 769 N.W.2d 880, 884 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]hen the supreme court is equally divided on an issue upon which the district court and court of appeals differ, the decision of the district court is affirmed by operation of law.”). Copies to:
Jamie Lynn Hunter Dickey & Campbell PLC 301 East Walnut Street, Suite 1 Des Moines, IA 50309
John O. Haraldson Assistant County Attorney 602 Robert D. Ray Drive Des Moines, IA 50309
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dianna Helmers v. City of Des Moines, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dianna-helmers-v-city-of-des-moines-iowa-2019.