Diane Zamora v. Rick Thaler, Director
This text of 407 F. App'x 802 (Diane Zamora v. Rick Thaler, Director) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Diane Michelle Zamora, Texas prisoner #814993, appeals the district court’s dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Zamora’s complaint alleged that, with no disciplinary hearing, prison officials removed her mother from the prison visitation list. She argues that this punishment violated her due process rights and her Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.
Punishments such as restrictions on visitation do not implicate due-process concerns. See Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 483-84, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995); McCray v. Sullivan, 509 F.2d 1332, 1334 (5th Cir.1975). Nor has Zamora made the requisite showing for an Eighth Amendment claim of cruel and unusual punishment. See Palmer v. Johnson, 193 F.3d 346, 352 (5th Cir.1999).
*803 In order to state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege the violation of a right protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States. West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48, 108 S.Ct. 2250, 101 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988). There is no constitutional basis for Zamora’s complaint that her mother was removed from the prison visitation list without a formal hearing. See Sandin, 515 U.S. at 483-84, 115 S.Ct. 2293; Palmer, 193 F.3d at 352.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
407 F. App'x 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diane-zamora-v-rick-thaler-director-ca5-2011.