Diane Scott v. Robert Broughton
This text of Diane Scott v. Robert Broughton (Diane Scott v. Robert Broughton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed March 19, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-1635 Lower Tribunal No. 2022-SC-114-M ________________
Diane Scott, Appellant,
vs.
Robert Broughton, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, James W. Morgan III, Judge.
Diane Scott, in proper person.
No appearance for appellee.
Before LINDSEY, MILLER, and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Diane Scott appeals a final judgment entered after a bench trial in
Scott’s defamation action. Because Scott has failed to provide a transcript
of the bench trial or statement of the evidence or proceedings upon which
the final judgment was based, we must affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett
Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (“Without a record
of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the
underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is
not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”); Gaspard v.
Innocent, 389 So. 3d 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (holding that affirmance is
required where there is no transcript or proper substitute and no fundamental
error on the face of the order appealed).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Diane Scott v. Robert Broughton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diane-scott-v-robert-broughton-fladistctapp-2025.