Diane G. v. Veronica R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Diane G. v. Veronica R.

221 A.D.2d 629, 635 N.Y.S.2d 499, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12375

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 27, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 221 A.D.2d 629 (Diane G. v. Veronica R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diane G. v. Veronica R., 221 A.D.2d 629, 635 N.Y.S.2d 499, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12375 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a custody [630]*630proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the paternal grandmother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Lubow, J.), dated October 12,1994, as granted custody of the child to the mother.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly found that an award of custody to the mother is in the best interests of the child based upon the testimony of the parties, the recommendations of the examining psychologist, the caseworker from the Child Welfare Administration, the Law Guardian, the forensic reports, and the court’s in-camera interview with the child (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167; Matter of Bennett v Jeffreys, 40 NY2d 543). O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a custody [630]*630proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the paternal grandmother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Lubow, J.), dated October 12,1994, as granted custody of the child to the mother.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly found that an award of custody to the mother is in the best interests of the child based upon the testimony of the parties, the recommendations of the examining psychologist, the caseworker from the Child Welfare Administration, the Law Guardian, the forensic reports, and the court’s in-camera interview with the child (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167; Matter of Bennett v Jeffreys, 40 NY2d 543). O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 A.D.2d 629, 635 N.Y.S.2d 499, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diane-g-v-veronica-r-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack