Diane E. Clements v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., CVS Caremark Corp., CVS Health, Caremark, LLC, and DM Designs, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 28, 2018
Docket05-17-01219-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Diane E. Clements v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., CVS Caremark Corp., CVS Health, Caremark, LLC, and DM Designs, Inc. (Diane E. Clements v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., CVS Caremark Corp., CVS Health, Caremark, LLC, and DM Designs, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diane E. Clements v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., CVS Caremark Corp., CVS Health, Caremark, LLC, and DM Designs, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Order entered June 28, 2018

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01219-CV

DIANE E. CLEMENTS, Appellant

V.

CVS PHARMACY, INC., CVS CAREMARK CORP., CVS HEALTH, CAREMARK, LLC, AND DM DESIGNS, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380-04930-2015

ORDER Appellant’s brief in this appeal is overdue. It was first due December 17, 2017.

On February 15, 2018, after two extensions for filing the brief had been granted, counsel

for appellant informed the Court appellant had died. He sought another extension and explained

that while appellant’s husband was expected to be appointed administrator of appellant’s estate,

he was not yet authorized to act on her behalf. Based on counsel’s representations, we extended

the deadline for filing the brief another thirty days and then another sixty days.

Our order granting the last extension directed appellant’s brief or a status report on the

probate proceedings be filed no later than May 28, 2018. To date, however, neither has been

filed. Accordingly, we again ORDER either appellant’s brief or a status report be filed. We caution that failure to comply by July 13, 2018 may result in the appeal being dismissed for want

of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Diane E. Clements v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., CVS Caremark Corp., CVS Health, Caremark, LLC, and DM Designs, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diane-e-clements-v-cvs-pharmacy-inc-cvs-caremark-corp-cvs-health-texapp-2018.