Diane Brownlee and Brandon Brownlee v. Walter C. Brogan, III, M.D., W. Chuck Brogan, III, M.D., Ph.D, P.A. D/B/A Brogan Heart Center Lubbock Lubbock Heart Hospital, L.P., Denise Rodela, R.N. and Shana Vinson, R.N.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 13, 2008
Docket07-08-00034-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Diane Brownlee and Brandon Brownlee v. Walter C. Brogan, III, M.D., W. Chuck Brogan, III, M.D., Ph.D, P.A. D/B/A Brogan Heart Center Lubbock Lubbock Heart Hospital, L.P., Denise Rodela, R.N. and Shana Vinson, R.N. (Diane Brownlee and Brandon Brownlee v. Walter C. Brogan, III, M.D., W. Chuck Brogan, III, M.D., Ph.D, P.A. D/B/A Brogan Heart Center Lubbock Lubbock Heart Hospital, L.P., Denise Rodela, R.N. and Shana Vinson, R.N.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diane Brownlee and Brandon Brownlee v. Walter C. Brogan, III, M.D., W. Chuck Brogan, III, M.D., Ph.D, P.A. D/B/A Brogan Heart Center Lubbock Lubbock Heart Hospital, L.P., Denise Rodela, R.N. and Shana Vinson, R.N., (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

NO. 07-08-0034-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

FEBRUARY 13, 2008

______________________________

DIANE BROWNLEE AND BRANDON BROWNLEE, APPELLANT

V.

WALTER C. BROGAN, III, M.D.; W. CHUCK BROGAN, III, M.D., Ph.D, P.A. D/B/A BROGAN HEART CENTER; LUBBOCK HEART HOSPITAL, L.P.; DENISE RODELA, R.N. AND SHANA VINSON, R.N., APPELLEES _________________________________

FROM THE 99TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2007-539,760; HONORABLE WILLIAM C. SOWDER, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Appellants Diane Brownlee and Brandon Brownlee filed a motion to dismiss their

appeal. While their motion contained a certificate of service it did not contain a certificate

of conference as required by Rule 10.1. Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a)(5). We notified appellants

and appellees of this fact by letter of January 25, 2008, and therein explained that any

appellee wishing to file a response should do so within ten days of the letter. Having held the motion for ten days with no response from an appellee we proceed to the merits of the

motion.

As no decision of the Court has been delivered to date, we grant appellants’ motion

to dismiss the appeal. The appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be

entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). The parties

have not presented an agreement for taxation of costs. Therefore costs are taxed against

appellants. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

James T. Campbell Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Diane Brownlee and Brandon Brownlee v. Walter C. Brogan, III, M.D., W. Chuck Brogan, III, M.D., Ph.D, P.A. D/B/A Brogan Heart Center Lubbock Lubbock Heart Hospital, L.P., Denise Rodela, R.N. and Shana Vinson, R.N., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diane-brownlee-and-brandon-brownlee-v-walter-c-brogan-iii-md-w-texapp-2008.