Diana v. Massanari

Second Circuit

Diana v. Massanari

21 F. App'x 59

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedOctober 12, 2001

DocketNo. 01-6001

StatusPublished

This text of 21 F. App'x 59 (Diana v. Massanari) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diana v. Massanari, 21 F. App'x 59 (2d Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, and was submitted by plaintiff pro se and by counsel for defendant.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Hurd’s Decision and Order dated October 30, 2000, adopting the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Homer dated September 1, 2000. The United States has not consented to be sued on a claim such as that asserted by plaintiff. Accordingly, the district court properly dismissed the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

We have considered all of plaintiff’s arguments in support of subject matter jurisdiction and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, and was submitted by plaintiff pro se and by counsel for defendant.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Hurd’s Decision and Order dated October 30, 2000, adopting the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Homer dated September 1, 2000. The United States has not consented to be sued on a claim such as that asserted by plaintiff. Accordingly, the district court properly dismissed the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

We have considered all of plaintiff’s arguments in support of subject matter jurisdiction and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 F. App'x 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diana-v-massanari-ca2-2001.