Diana Ruth Lovell v. Christopher Weldon Martin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Diana Ruth Lovell v. Christopher Weldon Martin

DecidedMarch 13, 2012

Docket14-11-00055-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Diana Ruth Lovell v. Christopher Weldon Martin (Diana Ruth Lovell v. Christopher Weldon Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diana Ruth Lovell v. Christopher Weldon Martin, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

March 13, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DIANA RUTH LOVELL, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00055-CV V.

CHRISTOPHER WELDON MARTIN, Appellee ____________________

Today the Court heard the parties= joint motion to set aside the order signed by the court below on November 2, 2010, and to remand the cause to the trial court. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, the trial court=s order is VACATED without reference to the merits, and we REMAND the cause to the trial court for rendition of a judgment in accordance with the parties’ mediated and binding settlement agreement dated February 2, 2012, and for entry of an order that replaces, supplants and supercedes the November 2, 2012 order of the trial court.

We further order that that costs incurred in the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring them.

We further order this decision certified below for observance. We further order the mandate be issued immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

March 13, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DIANA RUTH LOVELL, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00055-CV V.

CHRISTOPHER WELDON MARTIN, Appellee ____________________

Today the Court heard the parties= joint motion to set aside the order signed by the court below on November 2, 2010, and to remand the cause to the trial court. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, the trial court=s order is VACATED without reference to the merits, and we REMAND the cause to the trial court for rendition of a judgment in accordance with the parties’ mediated and binding settlement agreement dated February 2, 2012, and for entry of an order that replaces, supplants and supercedes the November 2, 2012 order of the trial court.

We further order that that costs incurred in the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring them.

We further order this decision certified below for observance. We further order the mandate be issued immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Diana Ruth Lovell v. Christopher Weldon Martin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diana-ruth-lovell-v-christopher-weldon-martin-texapp-2012.