Diana Kearny Powell v. Henry H. Paige and John E. Powell

D.C. Circuit

Diana Kearny Powell v. Henry H. Paige and John E. Powell

355 F.2d 108, 122 U.S. App. D.C. 397, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3716

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedDecember 9, 1965

Docket19547_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 355 F.2d 108 (Diana Kearny Powell v. Henry H. Paige and John E. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diana Kearny Powell v. Henry H. Paige and John E. Powell, 355 F.2d 108, 122 U.S. App. D.C. 397, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3716 (D.C. Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The issues raised by this appeal have been before this court in one form or another on several occasions. See Powell v. National Savings and Trust Company, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 290, 296 F.2d 412, cert. denied, 368 U.S. 946, 82 S.Ct. 387, 7 L.Ed.2d 343 (1961), rehearing denied, 368 U.S. 1005, 82 S.Ct. 597, 7 L.Ed.2d 547 (1962); Powell v. National Savings & Trust Co., 114 U.S.App.D.C. 269, 314 F.2d 274 (1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. *109 920, 85 S.Ct. 275, 13 L.Ed.2d 334 (1964), rehearing denied, 379 U.S. 984, 85 S.Ct. 643, 13 L.Ed.2d 577 (1965); Powell v. National Savings and Trust Company, No. 17,658, decided November 19, 1963, rehearing en banc denied, January 15, 1964; Powell v. National Savings and Trust Company, No. 18,292, decided May 19, 1964. We have carefully considered the record, the briefs and the oral argument of appellant. We find nothing new contained therein which would require a reversal of the District Court’s judgment in this case.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The issues raised by this appeal have been before this court in one form or another on several occasions. See Powell v. National Savings and Trust Company, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 290, 296 F.2d 412, cert. denied, 368 U.S. 946, 82 S.Ct. 387, 7 L.Ed.2d 343 (1961), rehearing denied, 368 U.S. 1005, 82 S.Ct. 597, 7 L.Ed.2d 547 (1962); Powell v. National Savings & Trust Co., 114 U.S.App.D.C. 269, 314 F.2d 274 (1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. *109 920, 85 S.Ct. 275, 13 L.Ed.2d 334 (1964), rehearing denied, 379 U.S. 984, 85 S.Ct. 643, 13 L.Ed.2d 577 (1965); Powell v. National Savings and Trust Company, No. 17,658, decided November 19, 1963, rehearing en banc denied, January 15, 1964; Powell v. National Savings and Trust Company, No. 18,292, decided May 19, 1964. We have carefully considered the record, the briefs and the oral argument of appellant. We find nothing new contained therein which would require a reversal of the District Court’s judgment in this case.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

355 F.2d 108, 122 U.S. App. D.C. 397, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diana-kearny-powell-v-henry-h-paige-and-john-e-powell-cadc-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack