Diana Flores Peinado v. State
Opinion
Order entered September 3, 2014
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00418-CR No. 05-14-00419-CR
DIANA FLORES PEINADO, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10-25782-L, F12-00406-L
ORDER The Court REINSTATES the appeals.
On August 6, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s
brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the
appeals; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court-appointed counsel Jeffery Buchwald;
(3) Mr. Buchwald’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is his workload and
family medical issues; and (4) Mr. Buchwald requested a sixty day extension of time from the
August 28, 2014 hearing to file appellant’s brief.
We ORDER appellant to file his brief by OCTOBER 27, 2014. Due to the length of the
extension and the fact that appellant’s brief is already two months overdue, no further extensions will be granted. If the brief is not filed by the date specified, we will order Jeffrey Buchwald
removed as appellant’s counsel and will order the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent
appellant in these appeals.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the
Honorable Carter Thompson, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 5; and to counsel for
all parties.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Diana Flores Peinado v. State (Diana Flores Peinado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.