Diana Carter v. First Energy Nuclear Operating

274 F. App'x 480
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 23, 2008
Docket07-4101
StatusUnpublished

This text of 274 F. App'x 480 (Diana Carter v. First Energy Nuclear Operating) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diana Carter v. First Energy Nuclear Operating, 274 F. App'x 480 (6th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-Appellant Diana Carter appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee First Energy Nuclear Operating Company on her claims of failure to reasonably accommodate her alleged disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12001, et seq., and the Ohio Civil Rights Act (“OCRA”), Revised Code Chapter 4112, and her claim of retaliation under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant failed to reasonably accommodate her claimed disability and retaliated against her by placing her on short-term medical leave with full pay and benefits, rather than continuing the accommodation of her choosing. The district court granted summary judgment to Defendant because Plaintiff could not establish that she had suffered an adverse employment action, a required element of both her discrimination and retaliation claims, and Defendant reasonably accommodated Plaintiffs claimed disability by placing her on paid short-term leave.

We have carefully read the parties’ briefs, the applicable law, and the district court’s opinion, and we agree no genuine issues of material fact exist and Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on each of Plaintiffs claims. Because the district court’s decision is well-reasoned, we see no reason to embellish upon its opinion. Therefore, we AFFIRM the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendant on Plaintiffs ADA, OCRA, and FMLA claims for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 F. App'x 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diana-carter-v-first-energy-nuclear-operating-ca6-2008.