Diamond v. Witherspoon

Michigan Supreme Court

Diamond v. Witherspoon

716 N.W.2d 551, 2006 WL 1196460

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMay 5, 2006

Docket129092

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 716 N.W.2d 551 (Diamond v. Witherspoon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diamond v. Witherspoon, 716 N.W.2d 551, 2006 WL 1196460 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

716 N.W.2d 551 (2006)

Denise DIAMOND, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David WITHERSPOON, Defendant, and
City of Detroit, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 129092. COA No. 252657.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 5, 2006.

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

716 N.W.2d 551 (2006)

Denise DIAMOND, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David WITHERSPOON, Defendant, and
City of Detroit, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 129092. COA No. 252657.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 5, 2006.

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

716 N.W.2d 551, 2006 WL 1196460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diamond-v-witherspoon-mich-2006.

Opinion

Denise DIAMOND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David WITHERSPOON, Defendant, and City of Detroit, Defendant-Appellant.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Denise DIAMOND, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David WITHERSPOON, Defendant, and
City of Detroit, Defendant-Appellant.