Diamond v. Witherspoon

Michigan Supreme Court

Diamond v. Witherspoon

716 N.W.2d 551, 2006 WL 1196460

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 5, 2006·No. 129092·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

716 N.W.2d 551 (2006)

Denise DIAMOND, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David WITHERSPOON, Defendant, and
City of Detroit, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 129092. COA No. 252657.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 5, 2006.

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

716 N.W.2d 551 (2006)

Denise DIAMOND, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David WITHERSPOON, Defendant, and
City of Detroit, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 129092. COA No. 252657.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 5, 2006.

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.

Diamond v. Witherspoon, 716 N.W.2d 551, 2006 WL 1196460 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

716 N.W.2d 551 (Diamond v. Witherspoon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Denise DIAMOND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David WITHERSPOON, Defendant, and City of Detroit, Defendant-Appellant.

Related

Denise DIAMOND, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David WITHERSPOON, Defendant, and
City of Detroit, Defendant-Appellant.