Diamond v. Walmart Inc.

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: March 25, 2020
• Docket: 1:19-cv-00857
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 DERRIK DIAMOND, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-0857- JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE ) THE ACTION 13 v. )

14 WALMART, INC., ) (Doc. 29) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16

17 On March 23, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed that the above- 18 captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. (Doc. 29) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 19 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of 20 dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Because all parties who have appeared signed the 21 stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 22 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the 23 Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED.

26 Dated: March 25, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE