Diamond v. Walmart Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 25, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-00857·Unknown

Opinion

DERRIK DIAMOND, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-0857- JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE ) THE ACTION v. )

WALMART, INC., ) (Doc. 29) ) Defendants. ) )

On March 23, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed that the above- captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. (Doc. 29) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Because all parties who have appeared signed the stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

Dated: March 25, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diamond v. Walmart Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Diamond v. Walmart Inc. (Diamond v. Walmart Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)