Diamond v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided June 19, 2014·No. 14-5088·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 14-5088 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 06/19/2014

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

NORMAN DOUGLAS DIAMOND,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

AND

ZAIDA GOLENA DEL ROSARIO, Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

2014-5088

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 13-cv-0292-SGB, Judge Susan G. Braden.

ORDER

Norman Douglas Diamond filed only a confidential version of the attachments for his opening brief. The court notes that it appears that some of the information has been redacted. Under the court’s rules, Diamond must file both a confidential and a non-confidential version of the attachments. Fed. Cir. R. 28(d)(1).

Case: 14-5088 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 06/19/2014

2 DIAMOND v. US

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 28(d)(1), Diamond must file both a confidential and non-confidential version of his attachments within 21 days of the date of this order. The confidential version must not contain any redactions. The non-confidential version must have the confidential matter deleted and each page from which the confidential matter has been deleted must bear a legend stating so in accordance with Fed. Cir. R. 28(d)(1)(B). Failure to do so will result in the removal of the confidential status of the attachments currently on the court’s docket.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s26

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diamond v. United States, (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Diamond v. United States (Diamond v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.