Diamond v. Sternberg Motor Truck Co.

87 Misc. 305, 149 N.Y.S. 1000
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 87 Misc. 305 (Diamond v. Sternberg Motor Truck Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diamond v. Sternberg Motor Truck Co., 87 Misc. 305, 149 N.Y.S. 1000 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Bijur, J.

Plaintiff sued for personal injuries caused by an automobile truck. The evidence shows, with[306]*306out contradiction, that the truck was owned hy the defendant, and that the wages of the chauffeur were paid by the defendant; that the truck, however, was rented out to another concern, the Turner Company, which was engaged in snow removal; that the chauffeur took his instructions from that company, and that, in point of fact, although his wages were, under the agreement, to be paid by the defendant, he, personally, had been hired for this job by the Turner Company. Under the circumstances, if there is any liability, it is that of the Turner Company and not of the defendant under the rule which we have followed in Di Salvo v. Larkin & Son, Inc., 83 Misc. Rep. 111. See, also, Hanatsek v. Wilson, 161 App. Div. 634.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Seabury and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Devaney v. Lawler Corp.
56 P.2d 746 (Montana Supreme Court, 1936)
City of Tulsa v. Randall
1935 OK 1149 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 Misc. 305, 149 N.Y.S. 1000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diamond-v-sternberg-motor-truck-co-nyappterm-1914.