Diamond v. Simmons

Connecticut Appellate Court

Diamond v. Simmons

567 A.2d 850, 20 Conn. App. 807, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 364

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedNovember 22, 1989

Docket7881

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 567 A.2d 850 (Diamond v. Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diamond v. Simmons, 567 A.2d 850, 20 Conn. App. 807, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 364 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The named defendant, in this appeal from a judgment of foreclosure by sale, claims that the trial court erred (1) in ordering him to proceed to trial, (2) in failing to consider his alleged alcohol problem, and (3) in finding for the plaintiff and rendering a judgment of foreclosure by sale. We see no merit to these claims.

[808]*808The record discloses that counsel for the named defendant did not ask for a continuance, and that the named defendant failed to preserve his claim of an alleged alcohol problem. The record fails to disclose that the trial court abused its discretion or acted other than in accordance with applicable law in determining that a judgment of foreclosure by sale should enter.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The named defendant, in this appeal from a judgment of foreclosure by sale, claims that the trial court erred (1) in ordering him to proceed to trial, (2) in failing to consider his alleged alcohol problem, and (3) in finding for the plaintiff and rendering a judgment of foreclosure by sale. We see no merit to these claims.

[808]*808The record discloses that counsel for the named defendant did not ask for a continuance, and that the named defendant failed to preserve his claim of an alleged alcohol problem. The record fails to disclose that the trial court abused its discretion or acted other than in accordance with applicable law in determining that a judgment of foreclosure by sale should enter.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

567 A.2d 850, 20 Conn. App. 807, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diamond-v-simmons-connappct-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack