Diamond v. Marcinek
612 A.2d 55, 223 Conn. 910, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 289
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 353, is granted, limited to the following question:
“In the circumstances of this case, was the plaintiff entitled to rescission and restitution relating to rescission because of the defendants’ failure to disclose the existence of a service station in violation of General Statutes §§ 22a-134 or 22a-134a or applicable administrative regulations?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Diamond v. Marcinek, 612 A.2d 55, 223 Conn. 910, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 289 (Colo. 1992).
612 A.2d 55 (Diamond v. Marcinek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Diamond v. Marcinek
629 A.2d 350 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)
Holly Hill Holdings v. Lowman
619 A.2d 853 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1993)