Diamond v. Marcinek
612 A.2d 55, 223 Conn. 910, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 289
This text of 612 A.2d 55 (Diamond v. Marcinek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Diamond v. Marcinek, 612 A.2d 55, 223 Conn. 910, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 289 (Colo. 1992).
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 353, is granted, limited to the following question:
“In the circumstances of this case, was the plaintiff entitled to rescission and restitution relating to rescission because of the defendants’ failure to disclose the existence of a service station in violation of General Statutes §§ 22a-134 or 22a-134a or applicable administrative regulations?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Diamond v. Marcinek
629 A.2d 350 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)
Holly Hill Holdings v. Lowman
619 A.2d 853 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1993)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
612 A.2d 55, 223 Conn. 910, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diamond-v-marcinek-conn-1992.